Baseball Toaster Bad Altitude
Help
HAPs: Philadelphia
2006-02-21 16:19
by Mark T.R. Donohue

By request of our Research Department (by which I mean, my friend Ali) we move on to the Phillies in our Hastily Assembled Previews series. Ali thinks the Phillies are interesting (and so do I) because they're the swing team in a division with two clubs we think will be pretty good (Atlanta and the Mets) and two that will be pretty bad (Washington and Florida). Last year, everyone in the NL East finished .500 or better, but this is hardly the same Marlins team and the Nationals (if indeed they remain the Nationals) more than likely won't be as lucky as they were last season.

The Phillies, on the other hand, seem to have had nothing but bad luck the last few years. On an annual basis, they seem to underperform both in terms of preseason expectations and in how their work on the field translates into wins and losses. They weren't the unluckiest team in baseball in 2005 in this regard, but they were one of only two teams (the other was Oakland) who "should have" won their division last year based on third-order wins and didn't. Three years in a row I've picked them to win the NL East, and three years in a row they've missed out on the playoffs entirely. Well, that's it. They can find another patsy.

The 2006 Phillies are already to be credited for making the best out of two bad situations. The first, the deeply unconstructive Jim Thome/Ryan Howard first base logjam, was of their own making. They're going to end up paying quite a bit of Thome's salary with the White Sox for the next three years, but Howard will remain inexpensive through that period and in Aaron Rowand the Phils even managed to finesse a fairly useful player out of the transaction. They'll probably be seeing more of Rowand the .270 hitter than Rowand the .310 hitter, but he knows his way around center field and he has World Series Mystique now. World Series Mystique! The other bit of hard luck for Philadelphia, the underwhelming available offseason free agent talent, affected everybody. But as an upper-middle class team with a veteran core, the Phillies really took it on the chin. They didn't need to go on a spending spree to rival the Mets' to stay in contention in the division; they only needed to make a few canny, reasonably priced signings here and there. Trouble was, in this market nobody ended up signing for a reasonable price. You can't really blame them for not matching New York's offer to Billy Wagner. Nor can you fault them for not overpaying for the likes of Kevin Millwood, A.J. Burnett, or Jarrod Washburn to shore up their rotation. However, with the Mets wielding a double-barreled combination of young talent and fat stacks of money and Atlanta's run of divison titles possessing a near-supernatural inertia, Philadelphia's reward for a rational offseason will more than likely be a third-place finish.

Which is not to say they don't have some nice pieces. Rowand, Pat Burrell, and the strangely unloved Bobby Abreu make for a pretty nice outfield. Pretty much any serious Phillies fan can give you a thick manila folder's worth of anecdotal evidence that Abreu is useless in the clutch, not the player his numbers would have you think he is, or some such, but I'll tell you what. I'll give you every outfielder on the Rockies' 40-man for him right now. I'll even throw in every Colorado representative to the South Korean WB"C" team in there at no extra charge. I'm sure there's 200 major-league average innings of pitching in there somewhere. C'mon, it's Bobby Abreu. What so offends you people about a career .923 OPS? It's true that Abreu had a crummy second half last year, but I imagine he's a safe bet to bounce back. (The fantasy baseball community seems to agree with me, as I haven't seen Abreu taken later than 10th overall in a single mock draft. But if you'd rather have Matt Holliday, please let me know, or better still, let Dan O'Dowd know.)

On the infield you've got Howard at first and Chase Utley at second, which is very nice. Shortstop Jimmy Rollins is no superstar, but his once-outlandish contract extension seems less so now. At third, David Bell was so horrible last year he almost has to be better. They need him to be, because they haven't got a whole lot of other options. If either Abraham Nuñez or Alex S. Gonzalez starts a significant number of games for Philadelphia anywhere in the infield, baby, it's bad news. Things are more interesting turning to the rotation, where things are wide open enough for any of several young guys to win a job in spring training. Brett Myers, Jon Lieber, and Cory Lidle are the "established" guys. Randy Wolf is rehabbing from TJ and could provide a boost in the second half if they can patch things together until then. Gavin Floyd and Ryan Franklin, two guys that scouts used to love and statheads have always been skeptical about, will be in the preseason mix. Ryan Madson looks to transition successfully from middle relief to a starter's spot. Longer shots include Robinson Tejeda, Eude Brito, and Ricardo Rodriguez. If you have no idea who any of those guys are, you shouldn't feel ashamed about it.

Joe Torre rode Tom Gordon hard the last two years, and after the Phillies reluctantly let Wagner walk Gordon is now the Philadelphia closer. If you had to pick one 38-year-old reliever to sign to a three-year deal this is your guy, but...well, there's no roster requirements like that in the National League, as I understand it. It's hard to fault Philadelphia for panicking after losing Wagner to free agency, Ugie Urbina to Venezuelan prison, and Madson to the rotation. So what's left? Well, you should already know that no good can come of sentences in season previews that begin "If Arthur Rhodes and Rheal Cormier can pull it together...." The hope is that some guys will genuinely win the fourth and fifth starters' roles in spring training rather than backing into them, and the Tejeda and Madson roles from last season will be filled by either the actual Tejeda and Madson or their equivalents. Urbina and Wagner take with them a lot of strikeouts from the bullpen, and in a park as homer-friendly as Citizens Bank, that's most ungroovy.

So the offense will be good (and if Bell and Mike Lieberthal have comeback years, great), the rotation will be okay (maybe), and the bullpen will be pretty dreadful. Sounds to me like a recipe for .500 territory, assuming the evil eye the Marlins have had over this club has gone the way of Florida's major league talent. In any event, they're not winning the division. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on you...more. But fool me three times, I'm picking the Mets. So there.

Comments
2006-02-21 18:22:23
1.   das411
Fool me 14 times, Mark, and I've learned to just pick the &#%@(!* Braves every year.

If Gillick can pick up even a replacement-level 3B before the deadline this season, and the young arms we've heard so much about for so long can actually come through, the Phils could be in decent shape.

The Mets are not without holes either (2B, RF, brittle rotation), and a few of their key players (Pedro, Wagner, Floyd, Glavine, Lo Duca) have injury histories to be wary of. Dave Wright has definitely arrived, and Jose Reyes may finally see the OBP light this season, but their relief additions (Duaner Sanchez? Chad Bradford? Jorge Julio?) strike me as less than impressive.

The Braves --have-- to start falling back to Earth eventually, don't they? They are young at both OF corners and behind the plate, and Smoltz must eventually have one of those Randy Johnson 2005-type seasons. They always find ways to plug holes, but their bullpen is not exactly Wohlers - Remlinger - Rocker this year.

The Nats and Marlins will each be lucky to win 70 games, and the Braves and Mets hardly look like the 95-100 win powerhouses people seem to think they are. If the Phils can pick up a couple of wins from full seasons of Howard and Utley, the CF upgrade, and a solid back end of the rotation (= not having Padilla in there), I can see this being a three team race with NY, ATL, and PHI all finishing in the area of 90 wins and making the final weekend VERY interesting...

2006-02-21 18:22:30
2.   das411
Fool me 14 times, Mark, and I've learned to just pick the &#%@(!* Braves every year.

If Gillick can pick up even a replacement-level 3B before the deadline this season, and the young arms we've heard so much about for so long can actually come through, the Phils could be in decent shape.

The Mets are not without holes either (2B, RF, brittle rotation), and a few of their key players (Pedro, Wagner, Floyd, Glavine, Lo Duca) have injury histories to be wary of. Dave Wright has definitely arrived, and Jose Reyes may finally see the OBP light this season, but their relief additions (Duaner Sanchez? Chad Bradford? Jorge Julio?) strike me as less than impressive.

The Braves --have-- to start falling back to Earth eventually, don't they? They are young at both OF corners and behind the plate, and Smoltz must eventually have one of those Randy Johnson 2005-type seasons. They always find ways to plug holes, but their bullpen is not exactly Wohlers - Remlinger - Rocker this year.

The Nats and Marlins will each be lucky to win 70 games, and the Braves and Mets hardly look like the 95-100 win powerhouses people seem to think they are. If the Phils can pick up a couple of wins from full seasons of Howard and Utley, the CF upgrade, and a solid back end of the rotation (= not having Padilla in there), I can see this being a three team race with NY, ATL, and PHI all finishing in the area of 90 wins and making the final weekend VERY interesting...

2006-02-21 18:42:21
3.   das411
oy, sorry, strike through one o' those
2006-02-21 18:44:16
4.   Mark T.R. Donohue
I hope that's the case. I think the division will be won in the low 90-win range, but whichever team gets there will have to be a little lucky. Right now, I think the team with the best chance to be lucky is New York, but that could change. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that Atlanta, Philadelphia, and the Mets could all have years at the top end of expectations (it kind of happened to every team in the division last year, save the Phillies themselves), but if there's going to be a three-team race, it'll more likely be because the three contenders all disappoint. I think the Phillies will probably win about 87 games, and I think the Mets and Braves are just a little bit better than that. But it certainly would be a karmic correction were a Phillies team not quite as good as the ones from the last three years to sneak into the playoffs because their divisionmates finally hit runs of bad luck of their own.

If it ends up coming down to whose fourth and fifth starters suck the least, it certainly doesn't hurt the Phillies that they have a lot of options, even if none of them are particularly exciting. It could come down to a head-to-head matchup between two of the more unheralded arms in the division, two guys making the same pen-to-starter move this year -- Aaron Heilman and Ryan Madson. I'm fascinated by fourth starters and back-of-the-pen types (as a Rockies fan, I have to be, because that's all we usually have), so I very much hope it comes to that.

2006-02-21 20:07:10
5.   das411
Agreed, by no means should the Phillies be favorites this year but the 1999 Mets were far more talented than the 2000 version, and so on...

The point you make about the back ends of the rotations is a good one. Looking at it that way:

ATL - 4) Jorge Sosa, 5) John Thompson
NYM - 4) Victor Zambrano, 5) Aaron Heilman
PHI - 4) Ryan Madson, 5) Rob Tejeda

I actually think the Phils look good here. Thompson may have hit his ceiling last year and doesn't seem to have much potential in him to become a top-flight starter. Sosa looks like he could, and like Madson he will be in his first full year as a starter, but his years in Tampa Bay do raise some questions of his durability while Madson had been starting for most of his career until 2004.

Ask any Met fan how much they trust Zambrano in their rotation this year :) Heilman is yet another converted starter turned reliever, but I wonder whether Omar was wise to trade Benson AND Seo for relief help, while also including Petit in the deal for Delgado. That seems like an awful lot of innings he will have to scrape together somehow, and they could well end up with a modern-day Salomon Torres finishing off the season. They've had the debate over at DT many times, whether it is more valuable to have depth in the rotation or the bullpen, and we may get a fairly definitive answer this season.

2006-02-22 09:52:27
6.   Kels
I could read these reviews all day, thanks and keep them coming!
2006-02-22 15:11:39
7.   Voxter
Hey, you should do the Indians soon. I'm interested to hear your take on the AL Central.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.