Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
westernhomes (at) yahoo (dot) com
I'm not a big Christmas guy. I'm an atheist, and fairly vigorously so, and have been irritating my younger sisters for several years now by referring to the 25th as "Loot Day." I was here going to celebrate the holiday by listing all of the baseball-related loot I received, but I want a few days to read my Bill Simmons and White Sox books and view the 2005 World Series DVD. Perhaps it will renew your faith in the power of the season (if not mine) to learn that another fine post subject presented itself completely by accident.
While watching the Bears game over at my aunt and uncle's house, I started rifling through a pack of baseball cards one of my cousins had received in his stocking. I paused when I saw the Rockies' name on one of the cards, and again when I saw that it was a Mike Esposito card. I feel strangely connected to Esposito. The one minor league game I attended last season, in Colorado Springs, was started by Mike Esposito. By sheer random chance, I was present for his major league debut at Coors in September. For this reason, I've picked him as a test case for potential free agent pitching acquisitions. If you're not better than Esposito -- and many guys aren't -- then you're probably a waste of money. I like the way the guy works -- he hasn't a single plus pitch in his repertoire, but he gets better results than more talented players through smarts and control. If he played somewhere not 7,000 feet above sea level, he might have a nice national rep by now. But it was his lot in life to end up in the Rockies system.
And to have somebody else's picture on his baseball card. 2005 Topps card number UH273 has Esposito's name on the front, and indeed his unassuming visage on the back, but there's a young (black) Kansas City Royal on the front of the card. I believe it's Ruben Gotay. Alas, poor Mike. Perhaps 2006 will present a better opportunity for making your mark on the world.
Doesn't sound too enlightened to me.
I love how people on all points of the religious spectrum shut their brains off when it comes time to talk about what they believe. Not saying you do that, just saying.
By "vigorous atheist," I mean that I take my belief system fairly seriously. I've read a lot of books on either side of the debate, and I took three semesters of history of religion in college. I have a good idea about what I do and do not believe and why that's so. I'm not going to get into it any further than that, and I'm only commenting at all for clarification's sake.
I will say that deist or no, a very good way to really offend a serious-minded person is to imply that their credo is by definition incapable of providing deep engagement.
And
Merry CHRISTmas.
vr, Xeifrank
Equating atheism with apathy in this sense is a fallacy. Atheism doesn't imply not caring for or about
G-d or religion, it means not believing in it. I'm about as firm in that belief as any brimstone-breathing Evangelical is in his belief that G-d is real and hates homosexuals. I can't claim to speak for Mark, but that's how it works for me.
Bishop: You never ask a navy man if he'll have another drink, because it's nobody's goddamned business how much he's had already.
Judge Smails: Wrong, you're drinking too much your Excellency.
Bishop: Excellency, fiddlesticks, my name's Fred and I'm a man, same as you.
Judge Smails: You're not a man, you're a bishop, for God's sakes.
Bishop: There is no God...
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.